Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilia Denisov 4cac09c9f3 fix(payments): drop the notification sender-IP gate; re-check on its own cadence
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 3s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m55s
A real test payment on the contour exposed both problems at once. YooKassa
delivered the notification five times; all five were rejected because the
backend saw the sender as 10.77.0.1 — the contour sits behind a tunnel and
cannot observe real client addresses, the same reason the IP bans in this
repository are prod-only. The chips were not lost (the reconcile sweep would
have credited them), but the primary path was dead and the customer was left
watching an unchanged balance.

The address check is removed rather than made conditional. It never was the
security boundary — the confirming GET /v3/payments/{id} is — and the one thing
it bought is already bought earlier and far more tightly: the order is resolved
from the notification's metadata *before* any provider call, so a notification
naming no known order costs a single indexed read and stops there. Guessing a
live order id means guessing a uuid. Against that, an address check adds nothing
and breaks every deployment that cannot see real client addresses, while turning
any future change to YooKassa's published ranges into a silent degradation.

The second problem was mine. The reconcile threshold was keyed off the order
lifetime, so a lost notification cost the customer the full 30-minute TTL before
the chips landed. Those are different questions: the lifetime governs how long a
customer may take to pay, the re-check governs how soon we notice a lost
callback. Split apart — `payments.ReconcileAfter`, one minute, swept on every
reaper tick. The bound D49 was chosen for survives: the calls one order can
cause are still its lifetime divided by the sweep interval, a handful, not an
open-ended poll. Worst case for a failed notification drops from ~30 minutes to
~5; an order the customer is still paying for is left alone.

Tests: the foreign-sender test is replaced by the two properties that now carry
the load — a notification naming an unknown order makes no provider call at all,
and a genuine notification is honoured whatever address it appears to come from.
Plus one pinning that a seconds-old order is not polled.

The shared bundle budget goes 31 -> 32 KB, with the reason recorded in the
script header: every user-visible string lands in that chunk and it had been
sitting 40 bytes under the cap.

Decisions D48 and D49 revised.
2026-07-28 12:00:03 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 12e616ceae feat(payments): send no fiscal receipt; keep the code switchable
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m45s
The merchant accepts payments as a sole proprietor on НПД, which is outside
54-ФЗ: there is no online cash register, YooKassa does not serve receipts for
that regime at all (checked with their support), and each operation is reported
by the merchant to «Мой налог», which issues the чек. So no `receipt` is sent
with a payment or a refund.

This also removes a failure class rather than just code: a malformed receipt
was an API error at payment creation, which broke the purchase outright.

The fiscal code is kept dormant rather than deleted. All of it now sits behind
one switch, `BACKEND_YOOKASSA_VAT_CODE`: unset — the default — builds and sends
nothing; a 54-ФЗ rate code turns «Чеки от ЮKassa» back on unchanged. The return
is foreseeable, which is why the switch exists: НПД carries an annual income
ceiling, and losing the regime puts 54-ФЗ back in force, at which point this is
a deploy-variable edit instead of writing the integration again.

The D36 email anchor still gates a direct purchase. It had two justifications —
a recovery anchor and the receipt address — and only the second is gone; without
an email a paying customer who loses the account loses the chips with it. What
was missing is that the rule was enforced but never communicated: the wallet
showed the packs to a player signed in through VK or Telegram in a browser, and
tapping Buy produced a bare "something went wrong". It now says "add an email in
your profile" in the buy tab instead, linking to the profile; spending
already-earned chips is untouched. The predicate is a pure function so it is
covered by the node-env unit tests rather than needing a browser.

Tests: the receipt-off default is pinned by an integration test asserting a
purchase carries no receipt, and the dormant path by one that switches a VAT
code on and checks the receipt reappears with the right fiscal attributes;
plus unit coverage for the enable predicate and the wallet's email rule.

A note for whoever runs the numbers next: the shared (svelte + i18n) chunk is
now 40 bytes under its 31 KB gzip budget.

Decision D51 revised.
2026-07-28 11:40:59 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 395a307eca feat(payments): reverse refunds issued outside the console
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 22s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 29s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 19s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m52s
Two holes on the refund path, both found by asking what happens when a refund
does not come from our own `/_gm` button.

The merchant cabinet is a second entry point. An operator can refund there, and
such a refund never passes through our API — so the money went back while the
chips stayed credited, silently. Handle `refund.succeeded`: the refund is
re-read from the API (the notification body is no more evidence here than it is
for a payment), bound back to its order through the payment id recorded when
the payment was minted, and reversed through the same engine. It is idempotent
on (provider, refund id), so the event for a refund the console already
recorded reverses nothing twice.

The reversal engine is full-refund-only by design — it revokes exactly what the
pack funded and rejects any other amount — so a partial refund is recorded as
nothing at all and logged loudly for an operator. There is no non-arbitrary way
to decide how many chips a part-refund costs, and guessing would be worse than
asking a human.

Second hole: a refund can still be canceled while pending, and the ledger is
append-only. Recording on any non-empty refund id therefore risked revoking a
customer's chips for money that stayed with us, with no way to take the row
back. The console now records only a `succeeded` refund and tells the operator
to press again otherwise — the idempotency key returns the same refund rather
than paying twice.

Tests: unit (GetRefund, the refund notification envelope, a non-final status
surfaced to the caller); integration (a cabinet refund is reversed once and a
redelivery is a no-op, the event after a console refund changes nothing, a
partial refund records nothing, an unconfirmed refund reverses nothing, a
pending refund records nothing until it settles and then does).

The suite shares one database and the ledger dedupes refunds globally, so the
fake provider now mints a refund id per payment — a constant id made one test's
refund look like another's duplicate.

Decisions D50 (amended) and D52; the notification subscription list in the
deploy docs gains refund.succeeded.
2026-07-28 09:18:19 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 92ba527575 feat(payments): settle the direct rail through YooKassa
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
Replace Robokassa with YooKassa as the RUB direct-rail provider. The wallet
model is untouched: one `direct` segment, the same spend wall, the same
per-channel merchant shops (D42) and `shop` on the order (D44).

The two providers are not shaped alike, and that drives the change:

- Opening a purchase is now an outbound API call (`POST /v3/payments`,
  single-stage capture, redirect confirmation). The order id is both the
  `Idempotence-Key` and `metadata.order_id`, so a retried create cannot mint a
  second payment and a notification always resolves to its order.
- YooKassa does NOT sign notifications, so the body is never evidence: it only
  names a payment, which is re-read with `GET /v3/payments/{id}`, and only that
  answer is acted on. Two guards ride on it — the payment's metadata must name
  the order, and its `test` flag must match the shop's, so a test-shop payment
  can never credit real chips. The sender address is checked against YooKassa's
  published ranges first, which stops a forger turning each fabricated
  notification into an outbound call of ours.
- A notification lost for good would leave the money taken and the chips unowed,
  silently. The existing pending-order reaper now asks the provider about each
  order that reached its expiry age carrying a payment id, and credits the ones
  really paid — one request per order over its whole life, not polling.
- `payment.canceled` records a `failed` event, so a declined payment is finally
  surfaced to the customer as PAYMENTS.md §9 already specified.
- The admin refund moves the money through `POST /v3/refunds` before recording
  anything; a failed call records nothing, so the ledger cannot claim a refund
  that did not happen, and the recorded id is the provider's own.
- YooKassa has no cabinet-side generic receipt: «Чеки от ЮKassa» registers one
  only if the request carries it, so every payment and refund now sends an
  itemized `receipt` to the D36 confirmed email. The VAT rate code is a deploy
  variable; the settlement subject and method are constants.

Robokassa is retired, not deleted: the direct rail falls back to it when no
YooKassa shop is configured and no deployment sets its credentials, so reviving
it is a credentials change rather than a code change. Its variables are removed
from compose, .env.example, write-prod-env.sh and the three workflows, and
recorded in backend/internal/robokassa/README.md together with the cabinet
configuration and the revival steps. Ledger rows keep `provider = 'robokassa'`;
that literal is load-bearing for the idempotency index.

No migration and no wire change: `orders.provider_payment_id` already existed,
and the client is rail-agnostic.

Decisions D47-D51 (revising D41) and stage E12 are baked into the docs.
2026-07-28 08:51:31 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 1507ceb793 feat(payments): live payment-availability kill switch + per-account override
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 3s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 2m0s
Let an operator disable purchases live from the admin — a whole rail/channel or
one account — and show the user a localized reason on their next attempt, so a
provider outage or a misconfig is explained instead of a silent dead button.

- rail kill switch (payments.rail_status, per rail direct:web / direct:android /
  vk / telegram): enabled + a per-language message, edited on the catalog page.
  Fail-open — a rail with no row stays enabled, so payments are never accidentally
  killed. The intake gate (CanPurchase in handleWalletOrder, before the order)
  returns payment_unavailable + the localized message, orthogonal to the security
  gates.
- per-account override (payments.account_payment_override, a row only for
  non-default): allow / deny / default, edited on the user card. "allow" bypasses
  ONLY the ops rail switch, never the security gates (trusted platform, the email
  anchor, the VK-iOS freeze, the min client version).
- wire: an additive ExecuteResponse.message envelope field (frozen-contract-safe);
  the gateway forwards a backend domain-error message; the client shows it on a
  payment_unavailable buy attempt.
- admin: rail toggles on the catalog page, the override control on the user card.
- tests: the pure gate (unit, TDD), the store + gate + override end-to-end
  (integration, migration 00016), the client (svelte-check / vitest).
- docs: PAYMENTS (+ru), the decisions log (D45/D46). Fiscalization stays
  cabinet-side (owner decision) — no itemized-receipt code.

Contour-safe: additive migration (two new tables, no wipe), the wire add is
additive, and fail-open so nothing is disabled until an operator acts.
2026-07-14 16:29:41 +02:00
Ilia Denisov eef90a152e feat(payments): per-channel Robokassa shops on the direct rail
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 19s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 2m0s
Split the single Robokassa direct rail into one merchant shop per channel
(web / android; ios later), chosen by the trusted X-Platform subtype, while
every shop still credits the one `direct` wallet — merchant-account separation
for accounting and receipts, not a new wallet.

- config: a channel-keyed shops registry (web seeds from the legacy vars or
  _WEB_*, android from _ANDROID_*); an empty shop leaves the rail dormant;
  per-shop validation.
- intake: the order picks its shop by subtype (unknown falls back to web); the
  per-shop Result callback is verified by that shop's own Password2 at
  /pay/robokassa/result/<channel> (the gateway extracts the channel; Caddy's
  /pay/* glob already forwards it — no Caddyfile change).
- persistence: an additive `shop` column on the order (migration 00015),
  recorded from the payment context, surfaced per entry in the admin report.
- standalone apps sign in by email only, so a direct purchase keeps its email
  anchor.
- docs: PAYMENTS (+ru) topology, deploy env vars + compose mapping, the
  decisions log (D41 revised for the ИП / 54-ФЗ move; D42-D44), the plan.

Contour-safe: dormant until shops are configured; the migration is additive
(no wipe); no client wire change. Fiscalization (Receipt/Email) and the gateway
`direct/android` subtype follow when the ИП / RuStore are live.
2026-07-14 14:57:34 +02:00
Ilia Denisov eb7fa98426 feat(payments): edit the rewarded-ads config from the admin catalog page
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / ui (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m57s
The "watch for chips" rewarded payout and its per-day / per-hour caps live in the
shared payments.config row and had no admin surface — they could only be changed by
SQL, contrary to D32 (the rewarded rate is meant to be admin-configurable). Add a
"Rewarded ads" form on the /_gm/catalog page: RewardConfig / SetRewardConfig on the
service (non-negative validated), a setRewardConfig store writer (the singleton
config row), the consoleSetReward handler + POST /_gm/catalog/reward route, and the
form pre-filled from the current config. No migration — the columns already exist.

The reward rate is a config value, not a sellable catalog atom (so a "no-ads forever"
style product is still out of scope by D32/D33).

Test: an integration test sets the config, checks the page pre-fill, and refuses a
negative value.
2026-07-14 10:40:27 +02:00
Ilia Denisov b5c8a04f0b fix(ads): share one interstitial cooldown timer across kinds
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
Cooldowns were tracked per kind ({move,hint}), so a hint ad and a move ad
did not see each other: after a hinted move's ad the move timer was still
zero, and the next plain move fired an ad immediately — two ads within a
minute, under the cooldown. Track a single shared last-shown time; the kind
only selects the required gap (hint 1m, move 5m, vs_ai 30m) measured from the
last interstitial of any kind. A hint can still fire on its shorter gap
(D30's "independent" hint cooldown), but never stacks a second ad within a
cooldown.

Tests: a hint uses the shorter shared gap; a move does not stack onto a
just-shown hint ad.
2026-07-10 03:36:18 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 13be7c3d9a feat(ads): VK post-move interstitial + retire deprecated hint_balance/paid_account
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
Interstitial video after a confirmed play or a hint, VK-only, offline
banner-only. The gate is client-mirrored: the backend puts the config
cooldowns (global 5m / vs_ai 30m / hint 1m) and a suppressed flag (the
no-ads / no_banner gate, same as the banner) on Profile.ads via adsFor;
the client self-gates on a per-kind last-shown time in localStorage, with
the VITE_ADS_STUB contour "ad fired" toast. Never fires after a pass,
exchange or resign. maybeShowInterstitial + vkShowInterstitial; the codec
and gateway transcode carry the ads block.

Also retires the deprecated accounts.hint_balance / paid_account domain
usage (expand-contract, code only — the columns stay for a later DROP so
image rollback stays DB-safe): drop the Account fields and their scan, the
dead account.SpendHint, account.GrantHints and the admin grant-hints
action; the in-game hint display now comes wholly from the payments hint
benefit. Banner eligibility and account merge no longer read the legacy
flags.

Tests: ads.test.ts (the client-mirrored gate), the codec ads round-trip,
the gateway ads transcode test, and a profile ads-config integration test
(cooldowns + suppressed under no-ads / no_banner). Docs: PAYMENTS §10 (+ru)
interstitial, the decision amends, backend README, the plan.
2026-07-10 02:48:10 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 9acf6ab3b4 fix(payments): VK-iOS freeze is purchase-only; remove the rewarded diagnostic
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 20s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 2m5s
Testing the rewarded slice surfaced a contradiction: rewarded ads let a VK-iOS
user earn vk chips, but the blanket VK-iOS "spend freeze" then blocked spending
them (the wallet showed "5 (view-only)"). Apple's ToS forbids only BUYING in-app
values on VK-iOS (money -> chips), not spending or earning them — so the freeze is
corrected to purchase-only: vkFrozen() now gates only CreateOrder (the money-in
step), not spendableSources (spending). VK-wallet chips — earned via rewarded ads
or bought on the same account elsewhere (VK Android) — now spend on VK-iOS too.
(Owner's ToS finding.)

Also: the temporary contour diagnostic confirmed VK returns only {result:true} for
a rewarded view (no token/signature) — client-attested is final, no hardening
possible — so the diagnostic (the log and the diag wire field) is removed.

Docs: PAYMENTS(+ru) VK-iOS freeze + D17 amend + PLAN E6. Tests updated (gate /
wallet VK-iOS now spendable).
2026-07-10 01:27:26 +02:00
Ilia Denisov dbd76d53e8 feat(ads): rewarded video (VK) — client-attested credit + daily/hourly caps
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 4s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
The first ads slice: a voluntary rewarded video credits chips. VK Mini App ads
(VKWebAppShowNativeAds) expose only a client-side watch result — no
server-to-server verify — so the credit is client-attested, guarded by a server
daily + hourly cap (config reward_daily_cap / reward_hourly_cap, default 50 / 10).
The caps are both anti-abuse (bounding a forger who skips the ad and calls the
endpoint directly) and an economic conversion lever (limiting free chips so a
player who wants more buys). D29 amended to VK's reality.

Backend: CreditReward (VK-only, order-less, idempotent on a client nonce, floored
by the caps; payout from config rewarded_payout_chips, default 0 = off) + the
wallet.reward edge op returning the updated wallet (reward_chips gates the
"watch for chips" CTA). Additive migration (two config columns).

Client: the ads-network abstraction (lib/ads.ts, VK impl) + the VK bridge
(vkRewardedReady / vkShowRewarded) + the Wallet CTA + i18n. A contour test stub
(VITE_ADS_STUB -> a toast instead of a real ad; prod always real) and a temporary
diagnostic that logs the raw VK data, so we confirm on the contour exactly what
VK returns (harden to signature-verify if it carries one).

Tests: backend integration (credit, nonce idempotency, hourly cap, disabled,
non-VK refusal) + codec unit (reward wire). Docs: PAYMENTS(+ru) §10, D29 amend,
PLAN E6. Bundle: shared budget 30->31 (reward i18n strings).
2026-07-10 00:41:42 +02:00
Ilia Denisov 1c06d1d0d1 feat(payments): chip wallet, store-compliance gate and benefit application
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
Stand up the internal chip/benefit mechanic behind the narrow payments interface:
context-aware balances and benefits, an atomic chip spend, admin grants as
zero-price value sales, the one-directional store-compliance gate (VK/TG same-
origin only, web draws direct→vk→tg, VK-iOS frozen, untrusted fail-closed), and
per-origin hint and no-ads application with term stacking. Reads are served from
an in-process, account-keyed write-through cache (mirroring the suspension gate),
so hot paths issue no query to the payments schema.

Flip the online-game hint wallet and the ad-banner suppression from the deprecated
accounts.hint_balance / paid_account columns to the payments benefit (a hint
balance no longer suppresses the banner — only a no-ads benefit does), and fold
chip segments and benefits by origin on account merge, inside the merge tx. Add
the GET/POST /api/v1/user/wallet edge chain (REST → Connect → FlatBuffers) plus
its codec unit test; no wallet UI yet.

Bring the frozen owner decisions log into the repo at
docs/PAYMENTS_DECISIONS_ru.md (it was untracked under .vscode) and reference it
from PLAN.md; record the read-cache design and the present-sources interface in
PLAN.md and docs/PAYMENTS.md (+ RU mirror).
2026-07-08 06:06:40 +02:00