3b744b7d2ff6e454d71664c0a3315e765150d0dd
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
12e616ceae |
feat(payments): send no fiscal receipt; keep the code switchable
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m45s
The merchant accepts payments as a sole proprietor on НПД, which is outside 54-ФЗ: there is no online cash register, YooKassa does not serve receipts for that regime at all (checked with their support), and each operation is reported by the merchant to «Мой налог», which issues the чек. So no `receipt` is sent with a payment or a refund. This also removes a failure class rather than just code: a malformed receipt was an API error at payment creation, which broke the purchase outright. The fiscal code is kept dormant rather than deleted. All of it now sits behind one switch, `BACKEND_YOOKASSA_VAT_CODE`: unset — the default — builds and sends nothing; a 54-ФЗ rate code turns «Чеки от ЮKassa» back on unchanged. The return is foreseeable, which is why the switch exists: НПД carries an annual income ceiling, and losing the regime puts 54-ФЗ back in force, at which point this is a deploy-variable edit instead of writing the integration again. The D36 email anchor still gates a direct purchase. It had two justifications — a recovery anchor and the receipt address — and only the second is gone; without an email a paying customer who loses the account loses the chips with it. What was missing is that the rule was enforced but never communicated: the wallet showed the packs to a player signed in through VK or Telegram in a browser, and tapping Buy produced a bare "something went wrong". It now says "add an email in your profile" in the buy tab instead, linking to the profile; spending already-earned chips is untouched. The predicate is a pure function so it is covered by the node-env unit tests rather than needing a browser. Tests: the receipt-off default is pinned by an integration test asserting a purchase carries no receipt, and the dormant path by one that switches a VAT code on and checks the receipt reappears with the right fiscal attributes; plus unit coverage for the enable predicate and the wallet's email rule. A note for whoever runs the numbers next: the shared (svelte + i18n) chunk is now 40 bytes under its 31 KB gzip budget. Decision D51 revised. |
||
|
|
92ba527575 |
feat(payments): settle the direct rail through YooKassa
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / ui (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
Replace Robokassa with YooKassa as the RUB direct-rail provider. The wallet
model is untouched: one `direct` segment, the same spend wall, the same
per-channel merchant shops (D42) and `shop` on the order (D44).
The two providers are not shaped alike, and that drives the change:
- Opening a purchase is now an outbound API call (`POST /v3/payments`,
single-stage capture, redirect confirmation). The order id is both the
`Idempotence-Key` and `metadata.order_id`, so a retried create cannot mint a
second payment and a notification always resolves to its order.
- YooKassa does NOT sign notifications, so the body is never evidence: it only
names a payment, which is re-read with `GET /v3/payments/{id}`, and only that
answer is acted on. Two guards ride on it — the payment's metadata must name
the order, and its `test` flag must match the shop's, so a test-shop payment
can never credit real chips. The sender address is checked against YooKassa's
published ranges first, which stops a forger turning each fabricated
notification into an outbound call of ours.
- A notification lost for good would leave the money taken and the chips unowed,
silently. The existing pending-order reaper now asks the provider about each
order that reached its expiry age carrying a payment id, and credits the ones
really paid — one request per order over its whole life, not polling.
- `payment.canceled` records a `failed` event, so a declined payment is finally
surfaced to the customer as PAYMENTS.md §9 already specified.
- The admin refund moves the money through `POST /v3/refunds` before recording
anything; a failed call records nothing, so the ledger cannot claim a refund
that did not happen, and the recorded id is the provider's own.
- YooKassa has no cabinet-side generic receipt: «Чеки от ЮKassa» registers one
only if the request carries it, so every payment and refund now sends an
itemized `receipt` to the D36 confirmed email. The VAT rate code is a deploy
variable; the settlement subject and method are constants.
Robokassa is retired, not deleted: the direct rail falls back to it when no
YooKassa shop is configured and no deployment sets its credentials, so reviving
it is a credentials change rather than a code change. Its variables are removed
from compose, .env.example, write-prod-env.sh and the three workflows, and
recorded in backend/internal/robokassa/README.md together with the cabinet
configuration and the revival steps. Ledger rows keep `provider = 'robokassa'`;
that literal is load-bearing for the idempotency index.
No migration and no wire change: `orders.provider_payment_id` already existed,
and the client is rail-agnostic.
Decisions D47-D51 (revising D41) and stage E12 are baked into the docs.
|