feat(account): unlink provider + change-email edges (backend + gateway)

Unlink: POST /user/link/unlink (telegram|vk) via account.RemoveIdentity, refusing
the last identity; email is never unlinked. New fbs LinkUnlinkRequest + gateway
link.unlink op, returning the refreshed profile.

Change-email: purposeChange confirm-codes (RequestChangeCode/ConfirmChange) that
atomically replace the account's confirmed email (account.replaceEmailIdentity);
a new address owned by another account is refused without disclosure, never merged.
The one-tap deeplink handles purposeChange too. Reuses the LinkEmail* fbs tables;
gateway link.email.change.{request,confirm} ops + backendclient methods; branded
ru/en change-email copy.

backend/internal/account/email.go

@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@ const (
 )
 
 // Confirmation purposes recorded on a pending confirm-code row. They select what
-// verifying the code or the deeplink token does: sign in (login) or link/confirm the
-// address on the current account (link). Email change and account deletion add
-// further purposes in later stages.
+// verifying the code or the deeplink token does: sign in (login), link/confirm the
+// address on the current account (link), or replace the account's confirmed email with
+// a new address (change). Account deletion adds a further purpose in a later stage.
 const (
-	purposeLogin = "login"
-	purposeLink  = "link"
+	purposeLogin  = "login"
+	purposeLink   = "link"
+	purposeChange = "change"
 )
 
 // Errors returned by the email confirm-code flow.
@@ -326,6 +327,26 @@ func (s *EmailService) ConfirmByToken(ctx context.Context, token string) (LinkCo
 			return LinkConfirmation{}, err
 		}
 		return LinkConfirmation{Purpose: purposeLink, Account: pend.accountID}, nil
+	case purposeChange:
+		owner, ok, err := s.store.confirmedEmailAccount(ctx, pend.email)
+		if err != nil {
+			return LinkConfirmation{}, err
+		}
+		if ok && owner != pend.accountID {
+			// The new address is confirmed by a different account: refuse without
+			// disclosing it (anti-enumeration). Unlike a link, a change never merges.
+			return LinkConfirmation{}, ErrEmailTaken
+		}
+		if ok && owner == pend.accountID {
+			if err := s.store.consumeConfirmation(ctx, pend.id, s.now()); err != nil {
+				return LinkConfirmation{}, err
+			}
+			return LinkConfirmation{Purpose: purposeChange, Account: pend.accountID}, nil
+		}
+		if err := s.store.replaceEmailIdentity(ctx, pend.id, pend.accountID, pend.email, s.now()); err != nil {
+			return LinkConfirmation{}, err
+		}
+		return LinkConfirmation{Purpose: purposeChange, Account: pend.accountID}, nil
 	default:
 		return LinkConfirmation{}, fmt.Errorf("account: unsupported confirmation purpose %q", pend.purpose)
 	}
@@ -506,6 +527,50 @@ func (s *Store) confirmEmailIdentity(ctx context.Context, confirmationID, accoun
 	return nil
 }
 
+// replaceEmailIdentity consumes the confirmation, deletes the account's existing email
+// identity (freeing the old address) and inserts newEmail as its confirmed email, inside
+// one transaction. It backs the change-email flow. A unique-constraint violation — the
+// new address was confirmed elsewhere in the meantime — surfaces as ErrEmailTaken. When
+// the account holds no email identity yet the delete is a no-op, so this doubles as an
+// attach.
+func (s *Store) replaceEmailIdentity(ctx context.Context, confirmationID, accountID uuid.UUID, newEmail string, now time.Time) error {
+	identityID, err := uuid.NewV7()
+	if err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("account: new identity id: %w", err)
+	}
+	err = withTx(ctx, s.db, func(tx *sql.Tx) error {
+		upd := table.EmailConfirmations.
+			UPDATE(table.EmailConfirmations.ConsumedAt).
+			SET(postgres.TimestampzT(now)).
+			WHERE(table.EmailConfirmations.ConfirmationID.EQ(postgres.UUID(confirmationID)))
+		if _, err := upd.ExecContext(ctx, tx); err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("consume confirmation: %w", err)
+		}
+		del := table.Identities.DELETE().WHERE(
+			table.Identities.AccountID.EQ(postgres.UUID(accountID)).
+				AND(table.Identities.Kind.EQ(postgres.String(KindEmail))),
+		)
+		if _, err := del.ExecContext(ctx, tx); err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("delete old email identity: %w", err)
+		}
+		ins := table.Identities.INSERT(
+			table.Identities.IdentityID, table.Identities.AccountID, table.Identities.Kind,
+			table.Identities.ExternalID, table.Identities.Confirmed,
+		).VALUES(identityID, accountID, KindEmail, newEmail, true)
+		if _, err := ins.ExecContext(ctx, tx); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+		return nil
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		if isUniqueViolation(err) {
+			return ErrEmailTaken
+		}
+		return fmt.Errorf("account: replace email identity: %w", err)
+	}
+	return nil
+}
+
 // confirmEmailLogin consumes the login code and marks the existing email
 // identity confirmed, inside one transaction. The identity already exists (a
 // login provisioned it), so this updates rather than inserts and is idempotent