feat(payments): refund engine (best-effort revoke, never negative)
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / integration (pull_request) Successful in 18s
CI / ui (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / conformance (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / gate (pull_request) Successful in 0s
CI / deploy (pull_request) Successful in 1m45s

The last money-intake slice: reverse a paid order best-effort, exactly once. All
refunds are admin-triggered (E7) — no rail pushes an unsolicited refund (Robokassa
via its refund API / cabinet, VK via support, Telegram via refundStarPayment), so
this ships the engine they all converge on, not a webhook.

The Refund method matches the paid order, appends a refund ledger row (idempotent on
(provider, provider_refund_id) — distinct from the fund's payment id, so both
coexist), and revokes the funded chips floored at 0 (never negative — D27,
balances_chips_chk). When the chips were already spent, the unrecoverable remainder
is recorded as a per-account loss + abuse flag in the new additive
payments.account_risk table (read by the E7 report). The refund ledger row's chip
delta is what was actually reclaimed (the ledger stays reconcilable); the full
reversal rides in the snapshot; the order stays paid.

Additive migration (a new table only) -> rollback-safe, no contour wipe. Robokassa
refund-status polling is deferred (a worker not worth it at low chargeback volume);
failed events are not wired (no rail signals a hard post-charge server decline).

Tests: integration (full revoke; revoke-after-spend = floor-0 + loss + abuse;
duplicate idempotent; unpaid-order guard). Docs: PAYMENTS(+ru) §9, PLAN (E5 -> DONE).
This commit is contained in:
Ilia Denisov
2026-07-09 23:21:10 +02:00
parent ee9924c313
commit 21fb14facf
10 changed files with 461 additions and 23 deletions
+125
View File
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ var (
// ErrAmountMismatch means the callback's paid amount or currency does not match the order's
// expected amount — the credit is refused (§9: verify amount after matching by order id).
ErrAmountMismatch = errors.New("payments: paid amount does not match the order")
// ErrOrderNotPaid means a refund targets an order that was never funded — there is nothing to
// reverse (guards against a spurious loss/abuse record on an unpaid order).
ErrOrderNotPaid = errors.New("payments: order is not paid")
)
// errAlreadyCredited is the internal sentinel that unwinds the fund transaction when the ledger's
@@ -34,6 +37,10 @@ var (
// a replayed callback is a success that credits nothing.
var errAlreadyCredited = errors.New("payments: already credited")
// errAlreadyRefunded unwinds the refund transaction when the ledger idempotency index rejects a
// duplicate refund (same provider refund id). It is not surfaced: a replayed refund reverses nothing.
var errAlreadyRefunded = errors.New("payments: already refunded")
// packInfo is a chip pack resolved for an order: the product, the chips it funds and its price in
// the requested payment method's currency.
type packInfo struct {
@@ -271,6 +278,103 @@ func (s *Store) fund(ctx context.Context, orderID uuid.UUID, provider, providerP
return outcome, nil
}
// RefundOutcome reports a refund's result: whose funded segment was reversed, the chips actually
// clawed back (floored at 0), the unrecoverable remainder (a loss, when the chips were already
// spent), and whether the refund was a duplicate that reversed nothing.
type RefundOutcome struct {
AccountID uuid.UUID
Source Source
Revoked int
Loss int
AlreadyRefunded bool
}
// refund reverses a paid order's credit best-effort, exactly once. It matches the order (which must
// be paid), verifies the refunded amount, then in one transaction appends a refund ledger row
// (idempotent on the (provider, provider_payment_id) index — the refund id is distinct from the
// fund's payment id, so the two rows coexist), revokes the funded chips floored at 0 (never
// negative, D27/balances_chips_chk) and, when chips were already spent, records the unrecoverable
// remainder as a per-account loss and flips the abuse flag. A duplicate refund returns
// AlreadyRefunded with no second reversal. The ledger row's chipsDelta is what is actually
// reclaimed; the full reversal (money, original chips, loss) rides in its snapshot for the report.
func (s *Store) refund(ctx context.Context, orderID uuid.UUID, provider, providerRefundID string, refunded Money, now time.Time) (RefundOutcome, error) {
ord, err := s.orderByID(ctx, orderID)
if err != nil {
return RefundOutcome{}, err
}
if ord.status != "paid" {
return RefundOutcome{}, ErrOrderNotPaid
}
if refunded.Currency() != Currency(ord.currency) || refunded.Minor() != ord.expectedAmount {
return RefundOutcome{}, ErrAmountMismatch
}
chips, title, err := s.packForCredit(ctx, ord.productID)
if err != nil {
return RefundOutcome{}, err
}
src := Source(ord.origin)
outcome := RefundOutcome{AccountID: ord.accountID, Source: src}
pv, pr := provider, providerRefundID
productID := ord.productID
oid := orderID
err = withTx(ctx, s.db, func(tx *sql.Tx) error {
// Lock the funded segment and read what is left; a spent balance floors the reversal at 0.
var avail int
e := tx.QueryRowContext(ctx,
`SELECT chips FROM payments.balances WHERE account_id = $1 AND source = $2 FOR UPDATE`,
ord.accountID, string(src)).Scan(&avail)
switch {
case errors.Is(e, sql.ErrNoRows):
avail = 0
case e != nil:
return fmt.Errorf("payments: read balance for refund: %w", e)
}
revoked := min(chips, avail)
loss := chips - revoked
outcome.Revoked, outcome.Loss = revoked, loss
snapshot, e := marshalRefundSnapshot(ord.productID, title, chips, revoked, loss, refunded, providerRefundID)
if e != nil {
return e
}
if e := insertLedgerTx(ctx, tx, ord.accountID, "refund", &src, &src, -revoked, &productID, &oid, &pv, &pr, snapshot, now); e != nil {
if isUniqueViolation(e) {
outcome.AlreadyRefunded = true
return errAlreadyRefunded
}
return e
}
if revoked > 0 {
if _, e := tx.ExecContext(ctx,
`UPDATE payments.balances SET chips = chips - $3, updated_at = now()
WHERE account_id = $1 AND source = $2`,
ord.accountID, string(src), revoked); e != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("payments: revoke chips %s: %w", src, e)
}
}
if loss > 0 {
if _, e := tx.ExecContext(ctx,
`INSERT INTO payments.account_risk (account_id, abuse, loss_chips, updated_at)
VALUES ($1, true, $2, now())
ON CONFLICT (account_id) DO UPDATE
SET abuse = true, loss_chips = payments.account_risk.loss_chips + EXCLUDED.loss_chips, updated_at = now()`,
ord.accountID, int64(loss)); e != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("payments: record refund loss: %w", e)
}
}
return nil
})
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, errAlreadyRefunded) {
return outcome, nil
}
return RefundOutcome{}, err
}
s.cache.invalidate(ord.accountID)
return outcome, nil
}
// insertPaymentEvent appends an undispatched lifecycle event (succeeded/failed/refunded) for the
// dispatcher to deliver. orderID and payload (a jsonb detail blob) are optional.
func (s *Store) insertPaymentEvent(ctx context.Context, accountID uuid.UUID, orderID *uuid.UUID, eventType string, payload []byte, now time.Time) error {
@@ -373,6 +477,27 @@ func marshalFundSnapshot(productID uuid.UUID, title string, chips int, paid Mone
return b, nil
}
// marshalRefundSnapshot records the full reversal on the refund ledger row: the pack, the original
// funded chips, how many were actually reclaimed, the unrecoverable loss (already spent), the money
// refunded and the provider refund id — so the ledger stays reconcilable against the balance
// (chipsDelta = revoked) while the report still sees the whole reversal (§7/D27/D34).
func marshalRefundSnapshot(productID uuid.UUID, title string, chips, revoked, loss int, refunded Money, refundID string) ([]byte, error) {
b, err := json.Marshal(struct {
ProductID string `json:"product_id"`
Title string `json:"title,omitempty"`
Chips int `json:"chips"`
Revoked int `json:"revoked"`
Loss int `json:"loss"`
Amount int64 `json:"amount_minor"`
Currency string `json:"currency"`
RefundID string `json:"refund_id"`
}{productID.String(), title, chips, revoked, loss, refunded.Minor(), string(refunded.Currency()), refundID})
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("payments: marshal refund snapshot: %w", err)
}
return b, nil
}
// isUniqueViolation reports whether err is a PostgreSQL unique-constraint violation (SQLSTATE
// 23505) — here, a duplicate provider callback hitting the ledger idempotency index.
func isUniqueViolation(err error) bool {